Alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial Article

ESI Most Cited Paper Industry Collaboration International Collaboration

cited authors

  • Shaw, Alice T., Gandhi, Leena, Gadgeel, Shirish, Riely, Gregory J., Cetnar, Jeremy, West, Howard, Camidge, D. Ross, Socinski, Mark A., Chiappori, Alberto, Mekhail, Tarek, Chao, Bo H., Borghaei, Hossein, Gold, Kathryn A., Zeaiter, Ali, Bordogna, Walter, Balas, Bogdana, Puig, Oscar, Henschel, Volkmar, Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius, Study Investigators

funding text

  • This study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche. ATS is supported by a US National Institutes of Health grant (5R01CA164273). Third-party editorial assistance and graphic support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Joanna Musgrove of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche.

abstract

  • Background Alectinib-a highly selective, CNS-active, ALK inhibitor-showed promising clinical activity in crizotinibnaive and crizotinib-resistant patients with ALK-rearranged (ALK-positive) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the safety and effi cacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on previous crizotinib. Methods We did a phase 2 study at 27 centres in the USA and Canada. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with stage IIIB-IV, ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed after crizotinib. Patients were treated with oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily until progression, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by an independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Response endpoints were assessed in the response-evaluable population (ie, patients with measurable disease at baseline who received at least one dose of study drug), and effi cacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all enrolled patients). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials. gov, number NCT01871805. The study is ongoing and patients are still receiving treatment. Findings Between Sept 4, 2013, and Aug 4, 2014, 87 patients were enrolled into the study (intention-to-treat population). At the time of the primary analysis (median follow-up 4 . 8 months [IQR 3 . 3-7 . 1]), 33 of 69 patients with measurable disease at baseline had a confi rmed partial response; thus, the proportion of patients achieving an objective response by the independent review committee was 48% (95% CI 36-60). Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2, most commonly constipation (31 [36%]), fatigue (29 [33%]), myalgia 21 [24%]), and peripheral oedema 20 [23%]). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were changes in laboratory values, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase (seven [8%]), increased alanine aminotransferase (fi ve [6%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (four [5%]). Two patients died: one had a haemorrhage (judged related to study treatment), and one had disease progression and a history of stroke (judged unrelated to treatment).

authors

Publication Date

  • February 1, 2016

webpage

published in

category

start page

  • 234

end page

  • 242

volume

  • 17

issue

  • 2

WoS Citations

  • 288
  • 298

WoS References

  • 28